Effectiveness of home fire safety interventions. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
meta_analysis · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 31107902.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0215724 and PMC identifier 6527231.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To assess the effectiveness of Home Fire Safety (HFS) interventions versus other interventions/no interventions/controls on HFS knowledge and behaviour at short-, intermediate- and long-term follow ups. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed databases were searched from January 1998 to July 2018, and studies retrieved. Toddlers, children (primary or secondary school), teenagers or adults. HFS interventions compared to other interventions / no interventions / controls. HFS knowledge and behaviour. 10 studies were identified (8 RCTs and 2 prospective cohort). Two studies assessed the effects of HFS interventions vs no interventions on HFS knowledge at up to 4 months follow up in school children and demonstrated significant difference between groups (very low quality, 2 RCTs, 535 participants, SMD 0.38, 95% CI: 0.21 to 0.55, p < 0.001). One study examined the effects of different modes of HFS interventions (computer-based vs instructor-led) on HFS knowledge and behaviour immediately post-intervention in adults and displayed no significant difference between groups (HFS knowledge; very low quality, 1 RCT, 68 participants, SMD -0.02, 95% CI: -0.50 to 0.45, p = 0.92) and (HFS behaviour; very low quality, 1 RCT, 68 participants, SMD 0.06, 95% CI: -0.41 to 0.54, p = 0.79) respectively. The limited evidence supports the use of HFS interventions to improve HFS knowledge and behaviour in children, families with children and adults.
Medical subject headings
- Fires
- Housing
- Outcome Assessment, Health Care
- Safety