Detection of <i>NTRK</i> Fusions: Merits and Limitations of Current Diagnostic Platforms.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 31196931.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-0372 and PMC identifier 6606326.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Oncogenic fusions involving <i>NTRK1, NTRK2</i>, and <i>NTRK3</i> with various partners are diagnostic of infantile fibrosarcoma and secretory carcinoma yet also occur in lower frequencies across many types of malignancies. Recently, targeted small molecular inhibitor therapy has been shown to induce a durable response in a high percentage of patients with <i>NTRK</i> fusion-positive cancers, which has made the detection of <i>NTRK</i> fusions critical. Several techniques for <i>NTRK</i> fusion diagnosis exist, including pan-Trk IHC, FISH, reverse transcription PCR, DNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS), and RNA-based NGS. Each of these assays has unique features, advantages, and limitations, and familiarity with these assays is critical to appropriately screen for <i>NTRK</i> fusions. Here, we review the details of each existing methodology.
Medical subject headings
- Biomarkers, Tumor
- Gene Rearrangement
- Neoplasms
- Oncogene Proteins, Fusion
- Receptor, trkA