Re-thinking How We Teach Quality Improvement: Adding Meaning to an ACGME Requirement.
other · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 31197728.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s11606-019-05059-7 and PMC identifier 6667725.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Many residency programs have struggled to meaningfully meet the ACGME quality improvement (QI) requirements. Similarly, our residents were receiving limited QI education, and their longitudinal projects were ineffective. Create an integrated didactic and experiential learning environment that equips residents to become leaders of QI. Internal medicine (IM) residency program of 45 residents in a large community hospital. This curriculum included eight content areas. Games, real-life application, and project celebrations cultivated engagement. Sessions occurred during residents' 2-week outpatient rotations. Project development was standardized. The QI Knowledge Application Tool-Revised (QIKAT-R) and separate surveys were used before and after the curriculum's implementation to evaluate resident QI knowledge and confidence, respectively. We also tracked QI scholarship and faculty engagement. Mean QIKAT-R scores improved significantly from 7.0 (SD 2.9) at baseline to 16.6 (SD 4.7) post-curriculum (n = 37 pairs, p = 0.043). Residents' adverse event reporting increased from 44% (19/43) at baseline to 90% (28/31) post-curriculum. Seven presentations were accepted for local, regional, and national conferences, compared with one presentation the preceding year. A QI curriculum can be successfully integrated in a "4 + 2" program.
Medical subject headings
- Curriculum
- Education, Medical, Graduate
- Internal Medicine
- Quality Improvement