<sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET Dissemination Features in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Are Predictive of Outcome.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 31201248.
- Also identified by DOI 10.2967/jnumed.119.229450 and PMC identifier 6954460.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
We assessed the predictive value of new radiomic features characterizing lesion dissemination in baseline <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET and tested whether combining them with baseline metabolic tumor volume (MTV) could improve prediction of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. <b>Methods:</b> From the LNH073B trial (NCT00498043), patients with advanced-stage DLCBL and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT images available for review were selected. MTV and several radiomic features, including the distance between the 2 lesions that were farthest apart (Dmax<sub>patient</sub>), were calculated. Receiver-operating-characteristic analysis was used to determine the optimal cutoff for quantitative variables, and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed. <b>Results:</b> With a median age of 46 y, 95 patients were enrolled, half of them treated with R-CHOP biweekly (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) and the other half with R-ACVBP (rituximab, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vindesine, bleomycin, and prednisone), with no significant impact on outcome. Median MTV and Dmax<sub>patient</sub> were 375 cm<sup>3</sup> and 45 cm, respectively. The median follow-up was 44 mo. High MTV and Dmax<sub>patient</sub> were adverse factors for PFS (<i>P</i> = 0.027 and <i>P</i> = 0.0003, respectively) and for OS (<i>P</i> = 0.0007 and <i>P</i> = 0.0095, respectively). In multivariate analysis, only Dmax<sub>patient</sub> was significantly associated with PFS (<i>P</i> = 0.0014) whereas both factors remained significant for OS (<i>P</i> = 0.037 and <i>P</i> = 0.0029, respectively). Combining MTV (>384 cm<sup>3</sup>) and Dmax<sub>patient</sub> (>58 cm) yielded 3 risk groups for PFS (<i>P</i> = 0.0003) and OS (<i>P</i> = 0.0011): high with 2 adverse factors (4-y PFS and OS of 50% and 53%, respectively, <i>n</i> = 18), low with no adverse factor (94% and 97%, <i>n</i> = 36), and an intermediate category with 1 adverse factor (73% and 88%, <i>n</i> = 41). <b>Conclusion:</b> Combining MTV with a parameter reflecting the tumor burden dissemination further improves DLBCL patient risk stratification at staging.
Medical subject headings
- Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse
- Positron-Emission Tomography