Untangling Infusion Confusion: A Comparative Evaluation of Interventions in a Simulated Intensive Care Setting.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 31210646.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003790 and PMC identifier 6629172.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC-ND.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Assess interventions' impact on preventing IV infusion identification and disconnection mix-ups. Experimental study with repeated measures design. High fidelity simulated adult ICU. Forty critical care nurses. Participants had to correctly identify infusions and disconnect an infusion in four different conditions: baseline (current practice); line labels/organizers; smart pump; and light-linking system. Participants identified infusions with significantly fewer errors when using line labels/organizers (0; 0%) than in the baseline (12; 7.7%) and smart pump conditions (10; 6.4%) (p < 0.01). The light-linking system did not significantly affect identification errors (5; 3.2%) compared with the other conditions. Participants were significantly faster identifying infusions when using line labels/organizers (0:31) than in the baseline (1:20), smart pump (1:29), and light-linking (1:22) conditions (p < 0.001). When disconnecting an infusion, there was no significant difference in errors between conditions, but participants were significantly slower when using the smart pump than all other conditions (p < 0.001). The results suggest that line labels/organizers may increase infusion identification accuracy and efficiency.
Medical subject headings
- Infusions, Intravenous
- Intensive Care Units
- Medication Errors
- Nursing Staff, Hospital