Continuous Noninvasive Carbon Dioxide Monitoring in Neonates: From Theory to Standard of Care.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 31248940.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1542/peds.2018-3640.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Ventilatory support may affect the short- and long-term neurologic and respiratory morbidities of preterm infants. Ongoing monitoring of oxygenation and ventilation and control of adequate levels of oxygen, pressures, and volumes can decrease the incidence of such adverse outcomes. Use of pulse oximetry became a standard of care for titrating oxygen delivery, but continuous noninvasive monitoring of carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) is not routinely used in NICUs. Continuous monitoring of CO<sub>2</sub> level may be crucial because hypocarbia and hypercarbia in extremely preterm infants are associated with lung and brain morbidities, specifically bronchopulmonary dysplasia, intraventricular hemorrhage, and cystic periventricular leukomalacia. It is shown that continuous monitoring of CO<sub>2</sub> levels helps in maintaining stable CO<sub>2</sub> values within an accepted target range. Continuous monitoring of CO<sub>2</sub> levels can be used in the delivery room, during transport, and in infants receiving invasive or noninvasive respiratory support in the NICU. It is logical to hypothesize that this will result in better outcome for extremely preterm infants. In this article, we review the different noninvasive CO<sub>2</sub> monitoring alternatives and devices, their advantages and disadvantages, and the available clinical data supporting or negating their use as a standard of care in NICUs.
Medical subject headings
- Carbon Dioxide
- Intensive Care, Neonatal
- Monitoring, Physiologic