Editorial Commentary: All-Suture Shoulder Glenoid Anchors: Can We Adequately Tension Them or Knot?
editorial · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 31272617.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.02.008.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
All-suture anchors require smaller drill holes (often under 2.0 mm) than comparable solid glenoid anchors (e.g., Gryphon: 2.5-mm drill). A smaller drill allows closer anchor approximation, but there is no indication that this improves repair biomechanics. In fact closely associated multiple fixation points are associated with glenoid fractures, and the same multiple fixation points can be achieved with double- or triple-loaded conventional anchors. All-suture anchors require deployment immediately adjacent to intact cortical bone. Without this, slack and pistoning of the suture ball anchor occur during cyclic loading and have been associated with bone cavitation, repair loosening, and gap formation. A mechanical tensioning mechanism more effectively removes the slack than hand tensioning by the surgeon. Drill length is another concern. All-suture anchor drills measure between 20 and 24 mm long. This length is commonly associated with far cortex penetration and places the suprascapular nerve and axillary nerve at increased risk of contact damage. Maximizing all-suture anchor performance is associated with mechanical deployment systems rather than hand traction applied by the surgeon. Finally, no current all-suture anchor is biodegradable, osteoconductive, or replaced by bone.
Medical subject headings
- Shoulder
- Suture Anchors
Anatomy
- scapula
- shoulder