Determinants of Rejection Rate for Coronary CT Angiography Fractional Flow Reserve Analysis.

Abstract

Background Coronary artery fractional flow reserve (FFR) derived from CT angiography (FFT_CT) enables functional assessment of coronary stenosis. Prior clinical trials showed 13%-33% of coronary CT angiography studies had insufficient quality for quantitative analysis with FFR_CT. Purpose To determine the rejection rate of FFR_CT analysis and to determine factors associated with technically unsuccessful calculation of FFR_CT. Materials and Methods Prospectively acquired coronary CT angiography scans submitted as part of the Assessing Diagnostic Value of Noninvasive FFR_CT in Coronary Care (ADVANCE) registry (<i>https://ClinicalTrials.gov</i>: NCT02499679) and coronary CT angiography series submitted for clinical analysis were included. The primary outcome was the FFR_CT rejection rate (defined as an inability to perform quantitative analysis with FFR_CT). Factors that were associated with FFR_CT rejection rate were assessed with multiple linear regression. Results In the ADVANCE registry, FFR_CT rejection rate due to inadequate image quality was 2.9% (80 of 2778 patients; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.1%, 3.2%). In the 10 621 consecutive patients who underwent clinical analysis, the FFR_CT rejection rate was 8.4% (<i>n</i> = 892; 95% CI: 6.2%, 7.2%; <i>P</i> < .001 vs the ADVANCE cohort). The main reason for the inability to perform FFR_CT analysis was the presence of motion artifacts (63 of 80 [78%] and 729 of 892 [64%] in the ADVANCE and clinical cohorts, respectively). At multivariable analysis, section thickness in the ADVANCE (odds ratio [OR], 1.04; 95% CI: 1.001, 1.09; <i>P</i> = .045) and clinical (OR, 1.03; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.04; <i>P</i> < .001) cohorts and heart rate in the ADVANCE (OR, 1.05; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.08; <i>P</i> < .001) and clinical (OR, 1.06; 95% CI: 1.05, 1.07; <i>P</i> < .001) cohorts were independent predictors of rejection. Conclusion The rates for technically unsuccessful CT-derived fractional flow reserve in the ADVANCE registry and in a large clinical cohort were 2.9% and 8.4%, respectively. Thinner CT section thickness and lower patient heart rate may increase rates of completion of CT fractional flow reserve analysis. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. <i>Online supplemental material is available for this article.</i> See also the editorial by Sakuma in this issue.