Neovagina creation methods and their potential impact on subsequent uterus transplantation: a review.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 31338951.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1111/1471-0528.15888.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Congenital uterovaginal aplasia commonly occurs in Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome. Various methods of neovagina creation exist, including nonsurgical self-dilation, surgical dilation, and surgical procedures involving skin or intestinal transplants. Subsequent uterus transplantation is necessary to enable pregnancy. We review the main characteristics, advantages, and disadvantages of established neovagina creation methods and discuss their suitability regarding subsequent uterus transplantation. Suitability criteria include sufficient vaginal length, absence of previous major intra-abdominal surgery, a natural vaginal axis, and a natural vaginal epithelium. In conclusion, Vecchietti-based laparoscopically assisted neovagina creation provides ideal functional conditions for uterus transplantation. Nonsurgical self-dilation and Wharton-Sheares-George vaginoplasty may also be suitable. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: This review discusses the main advantages and disadvantages of neovagina creation methods with regard to subsequent uterus transplantation.
Medical subject headings
- 46, XX Disorders of Sex Development
- Congenital Abnormalities
- Gynecologic Surgical Procedures
- Mullerian Ducts
- Preoperative Care
- Transplants
- Uterus