Physeal and Subphyseal Distraction Osteogenesis in Atrophic-type Congenital Pseudarthrosis of the Tibia: Efficacy and Safety.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 31393303.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000979.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To examine the efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes of distraction osteogenesis through the physis (PDO) or through subphyseal osteotomy (SPDO) in patients with atrophic-type congenital pseudarthrosis of tibia with proximal tibial dysplasia. To validate the efficacy and safety of PDO and SPDO, radiographic and clinical parameters were compared between 5 patients who underwent proximal tibial metaphyseal or metadiaphyseal lengthening as a control (group 1) and 7 patients who underwent PDO or SPDO (group 2). Postoperative complication was also compared between the groups. A significant difference in terms of healing index (group 1, 83.3±24.7 d/cm; group 2, 35.0±11.1 d/cm; P=0.001) and percentage increase (11.0%±3.7% vs. 23.1%±10.5%, P=0.034) was observed between the 2 groups. According to the Paley classification, group 1 included 1 "problems" case and 3 "obstacles" cases, whereas group 2 included 2 "problems" cases and 1 "obstacles" case. According to the Lascombes classification, group 1 included 2 grade IIIb cases and 3 grade IV cases, whereas group 2 included 6 grade I cases and 1 grade IIa case. Severe complications were significantly higher in group 1 compared with the group 2 (P=0.007). This study demonstrated that PDO or SPDO can be effectively and safely performed for tibial lengthening in atrophic-type congenital pseudarthrosis of tibia patients with proximal tibial dysplasia. Level III.
Medical subject headings
- Osteogenesis, Distraction
- Osteotomy
- Postoperative Complications
- Pseudarthrosis
- Tibia
Anatomy
- tibia