Impact of sagittal spine-pelvis-leg alignment and muscle strength on quality of life and low back pain in rural Japanese community- dwelling middle-aged and elderly persons.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 31403934.
- Also identified by DOI 10.3233/BMR-160618.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Lower limb compensation for spinal sagittal malalignment and its impact on quality of life (QOL) and low back pain (LBP) have not been well studied. To clarify postural compensation and the impact of spinal and lower limb sagittal alignment and muscle strength on QOL and LBP in persons > 50 years old. In this cross-sectional study, 122 rural community-dwelling, healthy adults (56 males, 66 females; average age 71.1 years; age range, 52-88 years) underwent assessments of QOL (36-Item Short-Form Health Survey; SF-36), LBP (Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire; RDQ), thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral inclination (SI), grip strength, lower limb strength, and back extensor strength (BES). On univariate and multivariate analyses, variables that correlated with QOL and the RDQ were identified. LL was moderately correlated with SI and weakly correlated with the knee flexion angle (KFA). LL, KFA, C7-L5D, and BES were correlated with SF-36 subscales and the RDQ. KFA contributed to the physical component summary of the SF-36. Female sex and BES contributed to the RDQ. Knee flexion compensated for lumbar kyphosis, but affected physical QOL scores negatively; BES was the most reliable contributor to QOL and the RDQ.
Medical subject headings
- Hand Strength
- Low Back Pain
- Muscle Strength
- Quality of Life
- Spinal Curvatures
Anatomy
- pelvis
- hand