MRI of Hip Arthroplasties: Comparison of Isotropic Multiacquisition Variable-Resonance Image Combination Selective (MAVRIC SL) Acquisitions With a Conventional MAVRIC SL Acquisition.

Abstract

<b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The objective of our study was to compare the quality and diagnostic utility of the following three metal artifact reduction sequences in evaluating hip arthroplasties: conventional multiacquisition variable-resonance image combination selective (MAVRIC SL), isotropic MAVRIC SL, and reduced-TR isotropic MAVRIC SL. <b>SUBJECTS AND METHODS.</b> Ninety-three hip arthroplasties (85 total hip replacements and eight hip resurfacings [nine bilateral hips]) in 84 patients (38 men and 46 women; mean age ± SD, 69.1 ± 9.7 years old) were imaged and evaluated. A calibration scan determined the number of spectral bins needed for each implant, and isotropic and conventional MAVRIC SL images were acquired. Reduced-TR isotropic MAVRIC SL scans were acquired for 40 arthroplasties. Two board-certified radiologists blinded to MRI acquisition evaluated images for clinical and image quality features and compared images using a mixed-effects ordinal logistic regression model and odds ratios. Rater agreement was assessed with Gwet agreement coefficients. Scanning times were compared using mixed-effects linear regression. Significance was set at <i>p</i> < 0.05. <b>RESULTS.</b> Calibration scans decreased the number of bins needed (median, 12 bins; interquartile range, 10-16 bins). Isotropic MAVRIC SL (mean scanning time, 7 minutes 16 seconds; 95% CI, 7 minutes 7 seconds-7 minutes 25 seconds) acquisitions had the longest scanning time, and conventional (mean, 5 minutes 46 seconds; 95% CI, 5 minutes 37 seconds-5 minutes 55 seconds) and reduced-TR isotropic (5 minutes 28 seconds; 95% CI, 5 minutes 15 seconds-5 minutes 41 seconds) MAVRIC SL acquisitions had scanning times that were similar. Both isotropic and reduced-TR isotropic MAVRIC SL images showed decreased blurring and improved visualization of the synovium and periprosthetic bone compared with conventional MAVRIC SL images (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Isotropic MAVRIC SL acquisitions more effectively improved signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), visualization of the synovium and periprosthetic bone, and lesion conspicuity and decreased blurring compared with reduced-TR isotropic MAVRIC SL acquisitions (<i>p</i> < 0.032). <b>CONCLUSION.</b> Isotropic MAVRIC SL acquisitions improve SNR, conspicuity of lesions, and visualization of synovium and periprosthetic bone and decrease blurring compared with conventional MAVRIC SL acquisitions.