The Acceptability and Feasibility of Using Mortality Prediction Scores for Initiating End-of-Life Goals-of-Care Communication in the Adult Intensive Care Unit.

Abstract

Uncertainties in prognosis remain a barrier to end-of-life (EOL) communication in the intensive care unit (ICU), thus strategies are needed for increasing the precision of prognosis and timeliness of EOL goals-of-care communication. Use of mortality prediction scores offers one approach to this issue. This study evaluated the acceptability and feasibility of providers' use of patient mortality prediction scores as part of routine practice to increase prognosis precision and timeliness of EOL communication as well as providers' intentions to change practice related to EOL goals-of-care communication based on awareness of the scores. An explanatory mixed-methods approach was used to provide Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) patient mortality prediction scores to ICU providers, who then completed an acceptability and feasibility questionnaire and participated in follow-up interviews conducted to further understand questionnaire responses and gain insight into their perceptions based on having SOFA scores. Providers reported that using SOFA scores was acceptable and feasible, although there was some disagreement about effectiveness of SOFA scores for determining mortality risk. Providers with limited ICU experience were eager, and accepting of the scores while those with more experience found the scores to be an adjunct to their own intuition, although all acknowledged the benefit of looking at score trends. An important finding was the need to consider SOFA scores in relation to patient clinical context. Use of SOFA scores as a means to potentially increase EOL goals-of-care communication emerged as most beneficial and acceptable to providers with limited ICU experience.