Feasibility and safety of ultra-low tidal volume ventilation without extracorporeal circulation in moderately severe and severe ARDS patients.

Richard, J C; Marque, S; Gros, A; Muller, M; Prat, G; Beduneau, G; Quenot, J P; Dellamonica, J et al. · Intensive Care Med · 2019

other · Level IV

Where this comes from

Abstract

Mechanical ventilation with ultra-low tidal volume (VT) during ARDS may reduce alveolar strain, driving pressure and hence ventilator-induced lung injury, with the main drawback of worsening respiratory acidosis. We hypothesized that VT could be reduced down to 4 ml/kg, with clinically significant decrease in driving pressure, without the need for extracorporeal CO<sub>2</sub> removal, while maintaining pH > 7.20. We conducted a non-experimental before-and-after multicenter study on 35 ARDS patients with PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ≤ 150 mmHg, within 24 h of ARDS diagnosis. After inclusion, VT was reduced to 4 ml/kg and further adjusted to maintain pH ≥ 7.20, respiratory rate was increased up to 40 min<sup>-1</sup> and PEEP was set using a PEEP-FiO<sub>2</sub> table. The primary judgment criterion was driving pressure on day 2 of the study, as compared to inclusion. From inclusion to day 2, driving pressure decreased significantly from 12 [9-15]  to 8 [6-11] cmH<sub>2</sub>O, while VT decreased from 6.0 [5.9-6.1] to 4.1 [4.0-4.7] ml/kg. On day 2, VT was below 4.2 ml/kg in 65% [CI<sub>95%</sub> 48%-79%], and below 5.25 ml/kg in 88% [CI<sub>95%</sub> 74%-95%] of the patients. 2 patients (6%) developed acute cor pulmonale after inclusion. Eleven patients (32%) developed transient severe acidosis with pH < 7.15. Fourteen patients (41%) died before day 90. Ultra-low tidal volume ventilation may be applied in approximately 2/3 of moderately severe-to-severe ARDS patients, with a 4 cmH<sub>2</sub>O median reduction in driving pressure, at the price of transient episodes of severe acidosis in approximately 1/3 of the patients.

Medical subject headings