Attitudes of Trainees in Obstetrics and Gynecology Regarding the Structure of Residency Training.

Abstract

To measure future and current resident perspectives on obstetrics and gynecology residency training structure and possible future models. Medical students invited for obstetrics and gynecology residency interviews and residents (postgraduate year [PGY]-1-4) at the University of Colorado, the University of Washington, the University of California San Francisco, Loyola University, Saint Joseph's Hospital, and Texas A&M in 2017-2018 received a voluntary, electronic survey regarding possible models for restructuring residency training. Student and resident responses were compared using χ test for categorical and two-sample t-test for continuous items. Applicants (63%, 280/444) and residents (66%, 101/153) had similar response rates (overall response rate 64%). Applicants (24%) and residents (29%) reported having concerns about the current structure of residency training. The ideal residency duration was reported as 4 years by 72% of applicants and 85% of residents. Lack of gynecologic surgical volume was the most frequently reported concern among applicants (75%) and residents (72%). Fourth-year tracking (focusing on training aligned with postgraduation career path) was preferred by 90% of applicants and 77% of residents (P=.002) and 92% among respondents planning fellowship. Most applicants (68%) and residents (75%) preferred not starting fellowship training after the 3rd year of residency. The majority of learners surveyed support a 4-year training structure but likewise support individualizing training in PGY-4. It is imperative that obstetrics and gynecology leadership consider this and other feedback from learners when considering modifications to the current training paradigm.