Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation Versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure to Prevent Primary Noninvasive Ventilation Failure in Extremely Low Birthweight Infants.
case_control · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 31604630.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.08.064.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Reducing the risk of primary noninvasive ventilation failure in extremely low birthweight infants is linked to reducing bronchopulmonary dysplasia. In a secondary analysis of randomized data, we identified that failure rates and time to failure were similar for nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation vs nasal continuous positive airway pressure.
Medical subject headings
- Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia
- Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
- Intermittent Positive-Pressure Ventilation
- Noninvasive Ventilation