Peering Into Peer Review: <i>AJR</i> Neuroradiology Reviewers Discuss Their Approaches to Assessing a Manuscript.
expert_opinion · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 31670589.
- Also identified by DOI 10.2214/AJR.19.21999.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
<b>OBJECTIVE.</b> This article provides comments from a small group of highly qualified reviewers of the <i>American Journal of Roentgenology</i> (<i>AJR</i>) regarding their approach to assessing manuscripts. The objective is to educate authors about the issues to which reviewers particularly attend and about errors that will decrease the likelihood of publication. <b>CONCLUSION.</b> By following the advice provided in this article, authors should be able to compose better manuscripts and reviewers should be able to generate better reviews.
Medical subject headings
- Neurology
- Peer Review, Research
- Periodicals as Topic
- Publishing
- Radiology