A new pathologic classification for elbow stiffness based on our experience in 216 patients.

Sun, Ziyang; Li, Juehong; Cui, Haomin; Ruan, Hongjiang; Wang, Wei; Fan, Cunyi · J Shoulder Elbow Surg · 2020

prospective_cohort · Level II

Where this comes from

Abstract

Elbow stiffness commonly causes functional impairment and upper-limb disability. This study aimed to develop a new pathologic classification to further understand and standardize elbow arthrolysis from a new perspective, as well as to determine clinical outcomes. Extension-flexion dysfunction was classified into 4 types: EF<sub>I</sub>, tethers alone; EF<sub>II</sub>, tethers with blocks; EF<sub>III</sub>, articular malformation; and EF<sub>IV</sub>, bony ankylosis. Forearm rotation dysfunction was classified into 3 types: FR<sub>I</sub>, contracture alone; FR<sub>II</sub>, radial head malunion or nonunion; and FR<sub>III</sub>, proximal radioulnar bony ankylosis. A total of 216 patients with elbow stiffness were prospectively included and categorized preoperatively. All surgical procedures were performed by the same chief surgeon; different types underwent specific procedures. Patient data, elbow motion, and functional scores were analyzed. Mean range of motion (ROM) increased from 40° preoperatively to 118° at final follow-up; 88% of patients regained ROM of 100° or greater. The forearm rotation arc (FRA) with forearm rotation dysfunction increased from a preoperative mean of 76° to 128°; 82% of patients regained an FRA of 100° or greater. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) increased from 63 to 91 points; the proportion of patients with good or excellent results was 95%. EF<sub>I</sub> patients had the best ROM (129°) and MEPI (93 points) and EF<sub>IV</sub> patients achieved the most-changed ROM (116°), whereas EF<sub>III</sub> patients had the worst ROM (104°) and MEPI (84 points) and the least-changed ROM (64°). The FRA was best in FR<sub>I</sub> patients (142°), followed by FR<sub>II</sub> patients (118°), and worst in FR<sub>III</sub> patients (82°); in contrast, the changed FRA was greatest in FR<sub>III</sub> patients (82°), followed by FR<sub>II</sub> patients (64°), and least in FR<sub>I</sub> patients (37°). This study suggests that the proposed pathologic classification provides a new perspective on the understanding and standardization of elbow arthrolysis, providing satisfactory clinical outcomes.

Medical subject headings

Anatomy