Role of Instruction Adherence During Highly Structured Robotic Arm Training on Motor Outcomes for Individuals After Chronic Stroke.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the effects of instruction adherence on upper limb motor outcomes after highly structured intervention. A secondary data analysis was completed using mixed linear modeling design. Thirty chronic stroke survivors with moderate-to-severe arm impairment were assigned explicit movement instructions and completed 12 robotic therapy sessions for 4 wks. Instruction adherence was measured weekly using the Manipulation Check Questionnaire. Motor outcomes were measured at baseline, discharge, and at 4-wk follow-up using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity and Wolf Motor Function Test-Functional Ability Scale. There were no effects of adherence-related variables on upper limb motor outcomes (P > 0.2). Participant scores improved for both Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity and Wolf Motor Function Test-Functional Ability Scale from baseline to follow-up (P < 0.001). Participants improved motor function after 12 wks of robotic training; however, instruction adherence did not affect motor improvement. Adherence to explicit information may play a limited role in motor learning for stroke survivors with moderate-to-severe arm impairment during highly structured training protocols.