Differences in Tumor Microenvironment Dictate T Helper Lineage Polarization and Response to Immune Checkpoint Therapy.
basic_science · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 31730856.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2019.10.029.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Immune checkpoint therapy (ICT) shows encouraging results in a subset of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) but still elicits a sub-optimal response among those with bone metastases. Analysis of patients' bone marrow samples revealed increased T<sub>h</sub>17 instead of T<sub>h</sub>1 subsets after ICT. To further evaluate the different tumor microenvironments, we injected mice with prostate tumor cells either subcutaneously or intraosseously. ICT in the subcutaneous CRPC model significantly increases intra-tumoral T<sub>h</sub>1 subsets and improves survival. However, ICT fails to elicit an anti-tumor response in the bone CRPC model despite an increase in the intra-tumoral CD4 T cells, which are polarized to T<sub>h</sub>17 rather than T<sub>h</sub>1 lineage. Mechanistically, tumors in the bone promote osteoclast-mediated bone resorption that releases TGF-β, which restrains T<sub>h</sub>1 lineage development. Blocking TGF-β along with ICT increases T<sub>h</sub>1 subsets and promotes clonal expansion of CD8 T cells and subsequent regression of bone CRPC and improves survival.
Medical subject headings
- Cell Lineage
- Immunotherapy
- T-Lymphocytes, Helper-Inducer
- Tumor Microenvironment