<sup>18</sup>FDG PET/CT in the early assessment of non-small cell lung cancer response to immunotherapy: frequency and clinical significance of atypical evolutive patterns.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 31760467.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s00259-019-04573-4.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
This prospective study aimed (1) to assess the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) evolutive patterns to immunotherapy using FDG-PET and (2) to describe their association with clinical outcome. Fifty patients with metastatic NSCLC were included before pembrolizumab or nivolumab initiation. FDG-PET scan was performed at baseline and after 7 weeks of treatment (PET<sub>interim</sub>1) and different criteria/parameters of tumor response were assessed, including PET response criteria in solid tumors (PERCIST). If a first PERCIST progressive disease (PD) without clinical worsening was observed, treatment was continued and a subsequent FDG-PET (PET<sub>interim</sub>2) was performed at 3 months of treatment. Pseudo-progression (PsPD) was defined as a PERCIST response/stability on PET<sub>interim</sub>2 after an initial PD. If a second PERCIST PD was assessed on PET<sub>interim</sub>2, a homogeneous progression of lesions (termed immune homogeneous progressive-disease: iPD<sub>homogeneous</sub>) was distinguished from a heterogeneous evolution (termed immune dissociated-response: iDR). A durable clinical benefit (DCB) of immunotherapy was defined as treatment continuation over a 6-month period. The association between PET evolutive profiles and DCB was assessed. Using PERCIST on PET<sub>interim</sub>1, 42% (21/50) of patients showed a response or stable disease, most of them (18/21) reached a DCB. In contrast, 58% (29/50) showed a PD, but more than one-third (11/29) were misclassified as they finally reached a DCB. No standard PET<sub>interim</sub>1 criteria could accurately distinguished responding from non-responding patients. Treatment was continued in 19/29 of patients with a first PERCIST PD; the subsequent PET<sub>interim</sub>2 demonstrated iPD<sub>homogeneous</sub>, iDR and PsPD in 42% (8/19), 26% (5/19), and 32% (6/19), respectively. Whereas no patients with iPD<sub>homogeneous</sub> experienced a DCB, all patients with iDR and PsPD reached a clinical benefit to immunotherapy. In patients with a first PD on PERCIST and treatment continuation, a subsequent PET identifies more than half of them with iDR and PsPD, both patterns being strongly associated with a clinical benefit of immunotherapy.
Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
- Lung Neoplasms