The Effectiveness and Value of Treatments for Spinal Muscular Atrophy.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 31778620.
- Also identified by DOI 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.12.1300 and PMC identifier 10398149.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Funding for this summary was contributed by the Laura and John Arnold Foundation and California Health Care Foundation to the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER), an independent organization that evaluates the evidence on the value of health care interventions. ICER's annual policy summit is supported by dues from Aetna, AHIP, Anthem, Blue Shield of California, CVS Caremark, Express Scripts, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Cambia Health Solutions and MedSavvy, United Healthcare, Kaiser Permanente, Premera Blue Cross, AstraZeneca, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, National Pharmaceutical Council, Sanofi, Alnylam, Novartis, HealthPartners, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Health Care Services Corporation, Mallinkrodt Pharmaceuticals, Prime Therapeutics, Regeneron, National Institute for Health Care Management, Commonwealth Fund, Partners Healthcare, New England States Consortium Systems, Allergan, Biogen, Editas, LEO Pharma, and HealthFirst. ICER has also received grants from Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, California Health Care Foundation, and the Laura and John Arnold Foundation. Pearson and Rind are employees of ICER. Thokala and Stevenson have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.
Medical subject headings
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Muscular Atrophy, Spinal