Paramedic attitudes and experiences of enrolling patients into the PARAMEDIC-2 adrenaline trial: a qualitative survey within the London Ambulance Service.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 31791962.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025588 and PMC identifier 6924800.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to gather the views and experiences of paramedics who participated in a large-scale randomised controlled drug trial and to identify barriers to recruitment. We surveyed paramedics using a questionnaire consisting of a mix of closed and open ended questions. The study was conducted within the London Ambulance Service, London, UK. 150 paramedics who were trained to enrol patients into the PARAMEDIC-2 randomised controlled trial of adrenaline versus placebo in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and who returned the questionnaire. 98% of study participants felt prehospital research was very important, and 97.3% reported an overall positive experience of being involved in a drug trial. Only 5.3% felt uncomfortable enrolling patients into the trial without prior consent from the patient or a relative. Over one- third (39.3%) identified one or more barriers to patient recruitment, the most common being the attitudes of other staff. We found a strong appetite for involvement in prehospital research among paramedics and an understanding of the importance of research that prevailed over the complexities of the trial. This is an important finding demonstrating that potentially ethically controversial research can be undertaken successfully by paramedics in the prehospital environment.
Medical subject headings
- Attitude of Health Personnel
- Emergency Medical Services
- Emergency Medical Technicians
- Epinephrine
- Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
- Patient Selection
- Qualitative Research