Twenty-four-hour subjective and pharmacological effects of ad-libitum electronic and combustible cigarette use among dual users.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 31837232.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1111/add.14931 and PMC identifier 7255919.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Relative pharmacological effects of e-cigarettes and cigarettes during 24 hours of ad-libitum use have not been described. In this study, 24-hour blood plasma nicotine concentrations and 48-hour subjective effects with use of cigarettes and e-cigarettes were measured among dual users. Two-arm within-subject cross-over design with preferred e-cigarette or cigarette ad-libitum use over 48 hours. Hospital research ward in San Francisco, California, USA. Thirty-six healthy dual users of e-cigarettes and cigarettes (n = 8, 25% females). Twenty-four-hour blood plasma nicotine and cotinine concentrations and 48-hour self-reported nicotine withdrawal symptoms and rewarding effects. Analyses used analysis of variance (ANOVA)-based mixed models with order of product (e-cigarette or cigarette) and product type (combustible cigarette or type of e-cigarette) as fixed effects, and subject as a repeated effect. During a 24-hour period, e-cigarettes produced lower nicotine exposure than cigarettes for the majority of users, although 25% received more nicotine from e-cigarettes, which was predicted by more frequent e-cigarette use or greater dependence. Compared to cigarette smoking, nicotine exposure for variable-power tank users was similar, while cig-a-like (t<sub>(30)</sub> = 2.71, P = 0.011, d = 0.745) and fixed-power tank users (t<sub>(30)</sub> = 3.37, P = 0.002, d = 0.993) were exposed to less nicotine. Cigarettes were rated higher than e-cigarettes on some desirable subjective effects (e.g. psychological reward, t<sub>(322)</sub> = 7.24 P < 0.001, d = 0.432), but withdrawal symptom reduction was comparable. No differences were found between e-cigarette types, but Bayes factors indicate that these measures were insensitive. During a 24-hour period in a hospital setting in the United States, nicotine exposure for dual users of e-cigarettes and cigarettes was similar when using cigarettes or variable-power tank devices only but was lower for those using cig-a-like or fixed-power devices only. Despite lower nicotine levels, all types of e-cigarette were effective in preventing withdrawal symptoms. E-cigarettes were rated less rewarding than cigarettes.
Medical subject headings
- Cigarette Smoking
- Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems
- Vaping