A Tobacco Control Framework for Regulating Public Consumption of Cannabis: Multistate Analysis and Policy Implications.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 31855488.
- Also identified by DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305423 and PMC identifier 6951385.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Eleven US states and Washington, DC, legalized recreational (adult use) cannabis. Seven states-Alaska, California, Colorado, Massachusetts, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington-allow cannabis sales. A public health concern is that exemptions in state or local smoke-free laws for public cannabis smoking or vaping will weaken smoke-free laws, expose the public to secondhand cannabis, and renormalize smoking.We describe the experience of the seven states and challenges faced in maintaining smoke-free laws. Using elements of a tobacco control framework, we identify best practices in cannabis regulation by comparing each state's smoke-free laws and allowances for public cannabis use. All states prohibit public cannabis use; two lack 100% smoke-free protections; one lacks vaping devices in its smoke-free law; three allow cannabis use in retailers; two allow cannabis use in social consumption lounges; and two allow cannabis use in tourism venues.States should close gaps in smoke-free laws and not expand where cannabis use is permitted to ensure public health.
Medical subject headings
- Cannabis
- Government Regulation
- Marijuana Smoking
- Public Policy
- Smoke-Free Policy
- Tobacco Smoke Pollution