The impact of residents sitting at the bedside on patient satisfaction during team rounds.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 31866194.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.pec.2019.12.013.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Patient satisfaction ratings are a priority for academic medical centers. Sitting during patient encounters has been recommended as a "best practice."<sup>1</sup> A prior study showed that hospitalists had higher-rated communication skills when sitting compared to standing at the bedside during rounds.<sup>2</sup> It is unclear whether the same is true of resident-led team rounds. We performed a cluster-randomized crossover trial assigning 18 internal medicine residents to sit or stand at the bedside during rounds. A total of 347 patients were surveyed to assess physician communication skills. Standing residents received higher ratings than sitting residents on 2 of 5 survey items and rounding duration did not differ. These results differ from prior work that suggests sitting is superior to standing<sup>2-6</sup>. We suspect that one rounding member sitting, while all others stand, is not enough to impact patients' perceptions. These results suggest that initiatives to optimize patient satisfaction on resident-staffed units should be focused elsewhere. Patients do not have better impressions of physician communication skills when one team member is sitting and the rest are standing.
Medical subject headings
- Internal Medicine
- Internship and Residency
- Patient Satisfaction
- Teaching Rounds