The Ellipse modification of the Friedman method for measuring glenoid version.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 32009429.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1302/0301-620X.102B2.BJJ-2019-0726.R1.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Accurate measurement of the glenoid version is important in performing total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Our aim was to evaluate the Ellipse method, which involves formally defining the vertical mid-point of the glenoid prior to measuring the glenoid version and comparing it with the 'classic' Friedman method. This was a retrospective study which evaluated 100 CT scans for patients who underwent a primary TSA. The glenoid version was measured using the Friedman and Ellipse methods by two senior observers. Statistical analyses were performed using the paired <i>t</i>-test for significance and the Bland-Altman plot for agreement. The mean glenoid version was -3.11° (-23.8° to 17.9°) using the Friedman method and -1.95° (-29.8° to 24.6°) using the Ellipse method (p = 0.002). In 16 patients the difference between methods was greater than 5°, which we considered to be clinically significant. There was poor agreement between methods with relatively large 95% limits of agreement. There was excellent inter-rater agreement between the observers for the Ellipse method and similarly, the intrarater agreement was excellent with a repeatability coefficient of 0.94. We recommend the use of the Ellipse modification to define the mid glenoid point prior to measuring the glenoid version in patients undergoing TSA. Cite this article: <i>Bone Joint J</i> 2020;102-B(2):232-238.
Medical subject headings
- Bone Malalignment
- Scapula
Anatomy
- scapula