Editorial Commentary: Revision of Failed Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
editorial · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 32014184.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.11.094.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Double-bundle (DB) reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament was favored for several years. However, recent studies increasingly show that this technique does not provide a clear advantage over the less-invasive single-bundle technique. Unfortunately, the graft fails relatively often after ACL reconstruction. Postoperative communication of the bone tunnels through bone tunnel widening is possible. Since 2 drill channels are created in the DB technique, femoral as well as tibial, it is assumed that this technique may cause problems during revision. So, in part, revision may require a 2-step procedure with bone graft filling of the tunnels as the first step. It is important that surgeons with experience using DB publish their revision strategies and experiences.
Medical subject headings
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Anatomy
- femur
- tibia