An Independent Validation of the Brighton Spondylodiscitis Score and a Proposal to Modify the Score.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 32039921.
- Also identified by DOI 10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00505.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The Brighton Spondylodiscitis Score (BSS) aims to identify patients with pyogenic spinal infections (PSIs) requiring surgery; an independent assessment of the BSS is required. We evaluated 60 patients with PSIs. Using the BSS, we determined whether patients with low, moderate, and high risk (LMHR) had different rates of surgery. We proposed a modified score (MS) using a logistic regression (LOGR). Applying the MS, we determined whether patients with LMHR exhibited different rates of surgery. Another LOGR determined the association of the BSS and the MS with surgery. A C-statistic using the BSS and the MS was generated. We studied 60 patients (mean age = 63 years); 37 (62%) were men; 30 (50%) required surgery. Using the BSS, patients with LMHR had similar rates of surgery (P = 0.53). LOGR showed that cervical PSIs had a larger chance of surgery (odds ratio [OR] = 7.3 [1.1 to 51.3]) than other locations. Using the MS, patients with moderate- and high-risk were operated more frequently than low-risk patients (P = 0.04). The BSS did not predict surgery (OR = 1.07; P = 0.31), but the MS did (OR = 1.16; P = 0.02). The C-statistic using the BSS (0.59) improved using the MS (0.69), P = 0.03. The discriminatory capacity to predict surgery of the BSS augmented using the MS. II (Diagnostic study: Transverse study).
Medical subject headings
- Discitis
- Research Design
Anatomy
- cervical spine
- lumbar spine
- thoracic spine