Does the <i>h</i>-index and self-citation affect external funding of orthopedic surgery research? An analysis of fellowship directors and their subspecialties.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 32042236.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.jor.2020.01.019 and PMC identifier 7000554.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Determine the impact of self-citation on external funding for orthopedic fellowship directors. The San Francisco Match's website identified directors encompassing 8 subspecialties. The Scopus database identified the number of publications, citations, and <i>h</i>-index for each director. <i>H</i>-index was assessed with/without self-citation. Mean publications, citations, self-citation rate, and <i>h</i>-index for the 446 directors were 71.2, 1816, 3.86%, and 18.3, respectively. Excluding self-citations reduces mean <i>h</i>-index to 18.0; and <i>h</i>-index changed by ≤ 1 integer in 95% of directors. Self-citation has minimal impact among fellowship directors and should not be adjusted for when considering external funding.