Custom triflange revision acetabular components for significant bone defects and pelvic discontinuity: Early UK experience.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 32071529.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.jor.2020.01.053 and PMC identifier 7016023.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
We report our early experience in acetabular reconstruction for significant bone loss and pelvic discontinuity using custom triflange acetabular components. Retrospective consecutive review of all patients treated at our specialist tertiary unit with significant acetabular defects (<i>Paprosky 3A/3B</i>) and pelvic discontinuity who were reconstructed with custom triflange implants. The primary outcomes were radiographic failure and complications. 17 patients (17 hips) were included; 3 males/14 females with a mean age of 72 years (range 61-83). The average follow-up was 3.6 years (2-7 years). Bony defects were <i>Paprosky</i> 3B in 13/17 hips (76%) with pelvic discontinuity encountered in the majority of cases 15/17 hips (88%) and intra-pelvic failed components in 11/17 (64%). At final follow up, no radiographic failures were observed although three patients developed complications (17.6%); haematoma requiring washout out; intra-operative ilium fracture; and recurrent dislocation in one patient. Our experience suggest that acceptable outcomes can be achieved with custom implants for this group of challenging patients, although longer follow up is needed to monitor future implants' failure.
Anatomy
- hip
- pelvis