Validation of a wearable system for 3D ambulatory L5/S1 moment assessment during manual lifting using instrumented shoes and an inertial sensor suit.

Faber, G S; Kingma, I; Chang, C C; Dennerlein, J T; van Dieën, J H · J Biomech · 2020

basic_science · Level V

Where this comes from

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of 3D L5/S1 moment estimates from an ambulatory measurement system consisting of a wearable inertial motion capture system (IMC) and instrumented force shoes (FSs), during manual lifting. Reference L5/S1 moments were calculated using an inverse dynamics bottom-up laboratory model (<sup>bu</sup>LAB<sub>model</sub>), based on data from a measurement system comprising optical motion capture (OMC) and force plates (FPs). System performance of (1) a bottom-up ambulatory model (<sup>bu</sup>AMB<sub>model</sub>) using lower-body kinematic IMC and FS data, and (2) a top-down ambulatory model (<sup>td</sup>AMB<sub>model</sub>) using upper-body kinematic IMC data and hand forces (HFs) were compared. HFs were estimated using full-body kinematic IMC data and FS forces. Eight males and eight females lifted a 10-kg box from different initial vertical/horizontal positions using either a free or an asymmetric lifting style. As a measure of system performance, root-mean-square (RMS) errors were calculated between the reference (<sup>bu</sup>LAB<sub>model</sub>) and ambulatory (<sup>td</sup>AMB<sub>model</sub> &<sup>bu</sup>AMB<sub>model</sub>) moments. The results showed two times smaller errors for the <sup>td</sup>AMB<sub>model</sub> (averaged RMS errors < 20 Nm or 10% of peak extension moment) than for the <sup>bu</sup>AMB<sub>model</sub> (average RMS errors < 40 Nm or 20% of peak extension moment). In conclusion, for ambulatory L5/S1 moment assessment with an IMC + FS system, using a top-down inverse dynamics approach with estimated hand forces is to be preferred over a bottom-up approach.

Medical subject headings