Functional complaints and quality of life after transanal total mesorectal excision: a meta-analysis.
meta_analysis · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 32154594.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1002/bjs.11566 and PMC identifier 7155085.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Total mesorectal excision (TME) gives excellent oncological results in rectal cancer treatment, but patients may experience functional problems. A novel approach to performing TME is by single-port transanal minimally invasive surgery. This systematic review evaluated the functional outcomes and quality of life after transanal and laparoscopic TME. A comprehensive search in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase and the trial registers was conducted in May 2019. PRISMA guidelines were used. Data for meta-analysis were pooled using a random-effects model. A total of 11 660 studies were identified, from which 14 studies and six conference abstracts involving 846 patients (599 transanal TME, 247 laparoscopic TME) were included. A substantial number of patients experienced functional problems consistent with low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). Meta-analysis found no significant difference in major LARS between the two approaches (risk ratio 1·13, 95 per cent c.i. 0·94 to 1·35; P = 0·18). However, major heterogeneity was present in the studies together with poor reporting of functional baseline assessment. No differences in function were observed between transanal and laparoscopic TME.
Medical subject headings
- Laparoscopy
- Proctectomy
- Quality of Life
- Rectal Neoplasms
- Rectum
- Transanal Endoscopic Surgery