Research Pearls: Checklists and Flowcharts to Improve Research Quality.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 32169662.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.02.046.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To instill quality in published clinical research, reporting guidelines, consisting of checklists and flowcharts, were developed to protect against reporting poorly designed research, and researchers should be aware of the available instruments and their appropriate use. With the popularity of synthetic reviews, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews, there is a greater need to assess risk of bias and study quality. This review highlights the most frequently used guidelines and checklists, risk-of-bias scales, and quality rating scales that can assist researchers with improving their research and its eventual publication.
Medical subject headings
- Checklist
- Research Design