Comparison of bony increased offset-reverse shoulder arthroplasty and standard reverse shoulder arthroplasty outcomes.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 32189885.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.jor.2019.10.019 and PMC identifier 7068018.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to evaluate functional outcomes and complications between the standard RSA and BIO-RSA. 65 consecutive procedures were performed in 60 patients (40 BIO-RSA and 25 RSA). There was no statistically significant difference in functional outcome, pain and complications. The BIO-RSA can produce comparable, if not better functional results than a standard RSA whilst reducing the rates of scapula notching, prosthesis instability, lost shoulder rotation and poor shoulder contour. It should therefore be considered in all patients presenting with cuff tear arthropathy, massive rotator cuff tear and fracture sequelae.
Anatomy
- shoulder