Lower Satisfaction After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery in Japan Than in the United States Despite Similar SRS-22 Pain and Function Scores: A Propensity-Score Matched Analysis.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 32205706.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003483.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
A multicenter retrospective case series. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of a surgical treatment for adult spinal deformity (ASD) in the United States (US) with those in Japan (JP) in a matched cohort. Surgical outcomes of thoracic-lumbar-sacral (TLS) spinal fusions in adult spinal deformity ASD patients who live in Asian countries are poorly understood. A total of 300 surgically treated ASDs of age more than 50 years with the lowest instrumented vertebra at the pelvis and a minimum follow-up of 2 years (2y) were consecutively included. Patients were propensity-score matched for age, sex, levels fused, and 2y postop sagittal spinal alignment. Demographic, surgical, and radiographic parameters were compared between the US and JP groups. A total of 186 patients were matched by propensity score and were almost identical within these parameters: age (US vs. JP: 66 ± 8 vs. 65 ± 7 yr), sex (females: 90% vs. 89%), levels fused (10 ± 3 vs. 10 ± 2), 2y C7 sagittal vertical axis (C7SVA) (5 ± 5 vs. 5 ± 4 cm), 2y Pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (9 ± 15° vs. 9 ± 15°), and 2y pelvic tilt (PT) (25 ± 10° vs. 24 ± 10°). Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores and Scoliosis Research Society patient questionnaire ((SRS-22) function and pain scores were similar at 2y between the US and JP groups (ODI: 27 ± 19% vs. 28 ± 14%, P = 0.72; SRS-22 function: 3.6 ± 0.9 vs. 3.6 ± 0.7, P = 0.54; SRS-22 pain: 3.6 ± 1.0 vs. 3.8 ± 0.8, P = 0.11). However, significantly lower satisfaction was observed in JP than in the US (SRS-22 satisfaction: 4.3 ± 0.9 vs. 4.0 ± 0.8, P < 0.01). Surgical treatment for ASD was similarly effective in patients in the US and in JP. However, satisfaction scores were lower in JP compared with the US. Differences in lifestyle and cultural expectations may impact patient satisfaction following ASD surgery. 3.
Medical subject headings
- Pain Measurement
- Patient Satisfaction
- Propensity Score
- Spinal Diseases