A systematic review in prosthetics and orthotics education research.

Abstract

Formal prosthetic/orthotic education has evolved greatly since its inception in the 1950s. The International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics has established guidelines and recognition for prosthetic/orthotic programs worldwide. However, the current state-of-the-science in prosthetic/orthotic education is largely unknown. To evaluate and synthesize available prosthetic/orthotic education research. Systematic review. Three bibliographic databases were searched and quality of included articles assessed using criteria from the National Institutes for Health Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort, Cross-Sectional Studies, and the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Qualitative Research Checklist, and Delphi quality criteria. This review included 25 articles from 23 studies. Included studies explored description, development, implementation, and/or assessment of the teaching/learning methods, curriculum, program, or country/region level. Studies were conducted in 18 countries and published in 14 journals. Methodological quality was rated high in 6 articles, moderate in 6, and low in 13. Content synthesis was not attempted due to the heterogeneous literature. This systematic review suggests that prosthetic/orthotic education research is only being conducted at a limited level. There is a strong need for high quality, collaborative education research to be conducted and published in peer-reviewed journals to improve prosthetic/orthotic education and build a global conversation. Research in prosthetic/orthotic education is limited. The current body of literature is not sufficient to inform and guide future education of prosthetic/orthotic students. Opportunities to improve prosthetic/orthotic education research include academic collaborations, a dedicated education special issue or journal, and disciplinary support for prosthetic/orthotic education research.