Diagnostic Performance of CT and Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction for Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Meta-Analysis.
meta_analysis · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 32301646.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1148/radiol.2020201343 and PMC identifier 7233409.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Background Recent studies have suggested that chest CT scans could be used as a primary screening or diagnostic tool for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in epidemic areas. Purpose To perform a meta-analysis to evaluate diagnostic performance measures, including predictive values of chest CT and initial reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Materials and Methods Medline and Embase were searched from January 1, 2020, to April 3, 2020, for studies on COVID-19 that reported the sensitivity, specificity, or both of CT scans, RT-PCR assays, or both. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were estimated by using random-effects models. The actual prevalence (ie, the proportion of confirmed patients among those tested) in eight countries was obtained from web sources, and the predictive values were calculated. Meta-regression was performed to reveal the effect of potential explanatory factors on the diagnostic performance measures. Results The pooled sensitivity was 94% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 91%, 96%; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 95%) for chest CT and 89% (95% CI: 81%, 94%; <i>I</i><sup><i>2</i></sup> = 90%) for RT-PCR. The pooled specificity was 37% (95% CI: 26%, 50%; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 83%) for chest CT. The prevalence of COVID-19 outside China ranged from 1.0% to 22.9%. For chest CT scans, the positive predictive value (PPV) ranged from 1.5% to 30.7%, and the negative predictive value (NPV) ranged from 95.4% to 99.8%. For RT-PCR, the PPV ranged from 47.3% to 96.4%, whereas the NPV ranged from 96.8% to 99.9%. The sensitivity of CT was affected by the distribution of disease severity, the proportion of patients with comorbidities, and the proportion of asymptomatic patients (all <i>P</i> < .05). The sensitivity of RT-PCR was negatively associated with the proportion of elderly patients (<i>P</i> = .01). Conclusion Outside of China where there is a low prevalence of coronavirus disease 2019 (range, 1%-22.9%), chest CT screening of patients with suspected disease had low positive predictive value (range, 1.5%-30.7%). © RSNA, 2020 <i>Online supplemental material is available for this article.</i>
Medical subject headings
- Clinical Laboratory Techniques
- Coronavirus Infections
- Pneumonia, Viral
- Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
- Tomography, X-Ray Computed