Interpretation and identification of within-unit and cross-sectional variation in panel data models.

Abstract

While fixed effects (FE) models are often employed to address potential omitted variables, we argue that these models' real utility is in isolating a particular dimension of variance from panel data for analysis. In addition, we show through novel mathematical decomposition and simulation that only one-way FE models cleanly capture either the over-time or cross-sectional dimensions in panel data, while the two-way FE model unhelpfully combines within-unit and cross-sectional variation in a way that produces un-interpretable answers. In fact, as we show in this paper, if we begin with the interpretation that many researchers wrongly assign to the two-way FE model-that it represents a single estimate of X on Y while accounting for unit-level heterogeneity and time shocks-the two-way FE specification is statistically unidentified, a fact that statistical software packages like R and Stata obscure through internal matrix processing.