Three-Dimensional Versus Radiographic Measurements for Analyzing Extra-Articular Distal Radius Malunion.

Abstract

To compare the accuracy of evaluating deformity in distal radius malunions using plain radiographic measurements compared with a 3-dimensional method involving 3-dimensional computer bone models. Consecutive patients who had an extra-articular distal radius malunion were included. Standard radiographs and computed tomography scans of both wrists were performed. Palmar tilt, radial tilt, and ulnar variance were measured on radiographs. The computed tomography scan data were sent to a workstation and 3-dimensional bone surface models of the radius were created. The 3-dimensional palmar tilt, 3-dimensional radial tilt, 3-dimensional ulnar variance, and axial rotational deformity were calculated. Thirteen patients, mean age 40 years (range, 22-57 years) were included. The 3 3-dimensional values were positively correlated with their corresponding radiographic values. Nevertheless, the 3-dimesional palmar tilt and 3-dimensional radial tilt values were slightly smaller than the radiographic palmar tilt and radial tilt. The quantitative difference between the 3-dimensional method and plain radiographs was on average 2° for the dorsal deformity group and 3° for the palmar deformity group. The 3-dimensional ulnar variance was significantly higher than the radiographic ulnar variance by an average of +1.3 mm for malunions with dorsal tilt and +0.6 mm for malunions with palmar tilt. The 3-dimensional method allowed us to measure the extent of the axial rotational deformity, which was 9° on average (range, 2° to 21°). Despite small differences, measurements made on both plain radiographs and 3-dimensional computer bone models are accurate for evaluating the deformity in extra-articular distal radius malunions. Our 3-dimensional method seems to provide a more accurate measurement of ulnar variance, particularly for dorsally angulated cases, and is helpful for measuring rotational malalignment. In this study, we found that either a 3-dimensional computer bone model or plain radiographs can be used as a benchmark to evaluate the deformity of extra-articular distal radius malunion. The 3-dimensional method can also be used to define axial rotational deformity.