Cost-effectiveness Applications of Patient-reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in Spine Surgery.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 32348090.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000982.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Because of the rising health care costs in the United States, there has been a focus on value-based care and improving the cost-effectiveness of surgical procedures. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can not only give physicians and health care providers immediate feedback on the well-being of the patients but also be used to assess health and determine outcomes for surgical research purposes. Recently, PROMs have become a prominent tool to assess the cost-effectiveness of spine surgery by calculating the improvement in quality-adjusted life years (QALY). The cost of a procedure per QALY gained is an essential metric to determine cost-effectiveness in universal health care systems. Common patient-reported outcome questionnaires to calculate QALY include the EuroQol-5 dimensions, the SF-36, and the SF-12. On the basis of the health-related quality of life outcomes, the cost-effectiveness of various spine surgeries can be determined, such as cervical fusions, lumbar fusions, microdiscectomies. As the United States attempts to reduce costs and emphasize value-based care, PROMs may serve a critical role in spine surgery moving forward. In addition, PROM-driven QALYs may be used to analyze novel spine surgical techniques for value-based improvements.
Medical subject headings
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Diskectomy
- Lumbar Vertebrae
- Orthopedics
- Patient Reported Outcome Measures
- Spinal Diseases
- Spinal Fusion
- Spinal Stenosis
Anatomy
- lumbar spine