The Impact of Radiobiologically Informed Dose Prescription on the Clinical Benefit of <sup>90</sup>Y SIRT in Colorectal Cancer Patients.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 32358093.
- Also identified by DOI 10.2967/jnumed.119.233650.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to establish the dose-response relationship of selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), when informed by radiobiological sensitivity parameters derived from mCRC cell lines exposed to <sup>90</sup>Y. <b>Methods:</b> Twenty-three mCRC patients with liver metastases refractory to chemotherapy were included. <sup>90</sup>Y bremsstrahlung SPECT images were transformed into dose maps assuming the local dose deposition method. Baseline and follow-up CT scans were segmented to derive liver and tumor volumes. Mean, median, and D<sub>70</sub> (minimum dose to 70% of tumor volume) values determined from dose maps were correlated with change in tumor volume and volumetric RECIST response using linear and logistic regression, respectively. Radiosensitivity parameters determined by clonogenic assays of mCRC cell lines HT-29 and DLD-1 after exposure to <sup>90</sup>Y or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT; 6 MV photons) were used in biologically effective dose (BED) calculations. <b>Results:</b> Mean administered radioactivity was 1,469 ± 428 MBq (range, 847-2,185 MBq), achieving a mean absorbed radiation dose to tumor of 35.5 ± 9.4 Gy and mean normal liver dose of 26.4 ± 6.8 Gy. A 1.0 Gy increase in mean, median, and D<sub>70</sub> absorbed dose was associated with a reduction in tumor volume of 1.8%, 1.8%, and 1.5%, respectively, and an increased probability of a volumetric RECIST response (odds ratio, 1.09, 1.09, and 1.10, respectively). Threshold mean, median and D<sub>70</sub> doses for response were 48.3, 48.8, and 41.8 Gy, respectively. EBRT-equivalent BEDs for <sup>90</sup>Y are up to 50% smaller than those calculated by applying protraction-corrected radiobiological parameters derived from EBRT alone. <b>Conclusion:</b> Dosimetric studies have assumed equivalence between <sup>90</sup>Y SIRT and EBRT, leading to inflation of BED for SIRT and possible undertreatment. Radiobiological parameters for <sup>90</sup>Y were applied to a BED model, providing a calculation method that has the potential to improve assessment of tumor control.
Medical subject headings
- Colorectal Neoplasms
- Liver Neoplasms
- Yttrium Radioisotopes