Editorial Commentary: Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction. Double Up It Is?
editorial · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 32370889.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.03.015.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
More than 100 surgical techniques have been described for the reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligament complex. None of the techniques appears superior, but double-button fixation for acute high-grade acromioclavicular dislocations has become an attractive option. The clinical outcomes are good to excellent, and the return to physical activity and sport is above 90%. However, complications such as loss of reduction and tunnel widening have been described and can reach up to 80%. The load to failure of the native coracoclavicular complex is more than 600 N, and any surgical technique must surpass this figure. Single-button and loop techniques do not always sufficiently stabilize the acromioclavicular joint. Even double- and triple-button techniques may not restore vertical and horizontal stability of the acromioclavicular joint to its native normal state. Double-button technique restores both scapula and clavicular rotation closest to the native state, but still has lower stiffness and results in higher superior-inferior translation, which could cause ongoing vertical instability.
Medical subject headings
- Acromioclavicular Joint
- Shoulder Dislocation
Anatomy
- clavicle
- scapula
- shoulder