Varying rates of patient identity verification when using computerized provider order entry.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 32377679.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1093/jamia/ocaa047 and PMC identifier 7647277.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
We sought to determine rates of computerized provider order entry (CPOE) patient identity verification and when and where in the ordering process verification occurred. Fifty-five physicians from 4 healthcare systems completed simulated patient scenarios using their respective CPOE system (Epic or Cerner). Eye movements were recorded and analyzed. Across all participants patient id was verified significantly more often than not (62.4% vs 37.6%). Vendor A had significantly higher verification rates than not; vendor B had no difference. Participants using vendor A verified information significantly more often before signing the order than after (88.4% vs 11.6%); there was no difference in vendor B. The banner bar was the most frequent verification location. Factors such as CPOE design, physician training, and the use of a simulated methodology may be impacting verification rates. Verification rates vary by CPOE product, and this can have patient safety consequences.
Medical subject headings
- Medical Order Entry Systems
- Patient Identification Systems
- Patient Safety