Does fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) affect the benefits of habitual physical activity on lung function in adults: a longitudinal cohort study.

Guo, Cui; Bo, Yacong; Chan, Ta-Chien; Zhang, Zilong; Lin, Changqing; Tam, Tony; Lau, Alexis K H; Chang, Ly-Yun et al. · BMC Med · 2020

prospective_cohort · Level II

Where this comes from

Abstract

Physical activity (PA) increases a person's inhalation of air pollutants due to greater ventilation, possibly leading to larger adverse health effects. This study aims to investigate the combined effects of long-term exposure to fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) and habitual PA on lung function in adults. This was a longitudinal cohort study that included 278,065 Taiwan residents with an age of 20 years old or above who joined a standard medical screening programme between 2001 and 2014. Each participant received at least one medical examination (including spirometric, blood, and urinary tests and a standard self-administered questionnaire survey) during the study period. We estimated the 2-year average PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations at each participant's address using a new physical model based on observational data. Information on the participants' PA was collected using the standard self-administrated questionnaire. Generalised linear mixed models were used to investigate the combined effects of PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PA on pulmonary function. We also performed stratified analyses by different levels of PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure and habitual PA. Each 10 MET-h increase in PA was associated with a higher level of 0.20%, 0.16%, and 0.19% in forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV<sub>1</sub>), and maximum mid-expiratory flow (MMEF), respectively, after adjusting for PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure and a wide range of covariates including age, sex education, body mass index, lifestyles, and health conditions. Each 10 μg/m<sup>3</sup> increase in PM<sub>2.5</sub> was associated with a lower FVC, FEV<sub>1</sub>, and MMEF (2.43%, 2.78% and 3.10%, respectively). Negative interactions were observed, and PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure was associated with a greater reduction in lung function among the participants with higher PA levels. We found significant negative interaction effects between long-term exposure to PM<sub>2.5</sub> and habitual PA, suggesting that the increased intake of PM<sub>2.5</sub> due to PA may attenuate the benefits of habitual PA on lung function. However, the PA benefits generally remained stable at different stratum of PM<sub>2.5</sub> in the stratified analyses, and habitual PA may still be recommended to people residing in relatively polluted regions.

Medical subject headings