Screening and follow-up of pregestational diabetes and gestational diabetes mellitus: A survey of primary care physicians in Belgium.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 32471771.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.pcd.2020.04.006.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Consensus regarding the best screening and follow-up strategy for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is lacking, resulting in heterogeneity in clinical practice. We aimed to evaluate screening and follow-up practices for pregestational type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and GDM in primary care in Belgium. We performed an online survey among primary care physicians (PCPs) in the northern part of Belgium, Flanders. Responses were obtained from 379 PCPs. Approximately two thirds of participants estimated the prevalence of pregestational T2DM and GDM in Flanders at 5% and <10%, respectively. The risk of developing T2DM within 10 years after a history of GDM was estimated at <30% by nearly half of all participants. The majority of interviewed PCPs screen for pre-existing T2DM and GDM. For T2DM, fasting glycaemia was used by 92.2% whereas for GDM, 75.2% used the 50g glucose challenge test (GCT). Fasting glycaemia was the preferred test for postpartum follow-up. While overall guideline adherence appears favourable, the prevalence of GDM is underestimated. Increased awareness on the long-term risk for women with a history of GDM is needed. The overall preference for the two-step strategy with GCT indicates that the 2019 Flemish guidelines on GDM screening are attainable in primary care.
Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Diabetes, Gestational
- Physicians, Primary Care