Symptomatic Dermographism: A Systematic Review of Treatment Options.
systematic_review · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 32473421.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.05.016.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Symptomatic dermographism (SD), the most common form of chronic inducible urticaria, presents with transient wheals accompanied by itching in response to scratching. Little is known about available treatment options and their efficacy in SD. To systematically review the efficacy of treatment options for patients with SD. Using predefined search terms, we searched for relevant literature published until September 2019. The systematic review process was consistent with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis recommendations. The 23 studies identified included 15 randomized controlled trials; 22 and 17 assessed treatment responses in patients with SD by provocation/threshold testing and patient/physician clinical assessment, respectively. Thirteen different treatments were investigated in a total of 430 adult patients. The most frequently studied therapy, first-generation H<sub>1</sub>-antihistamines, showed variable efficacy and significant side effects. In contrast, second-generation H<sub>1</sub>-antihistamines (2<sup>nd</sup>AH<sub>1</sub>), in all studies, were effective and well tolerated. Monotherapy with an H<sub>2</sub>-antihistamine (AH<sub>2</sub>) was not effective, whereas adding an AH<sub>2</sub> increased the efficacy of treatment with an H<sub>1</sub>-antihistamine (AH<sub>1</sub>). SD improved with omalizumab. All other treatments were only investigated in small, unrepeated, and/or uncontrolled studies. There are no studies on updosing of 2<sup>nd</sup>AH<sub>1</sub>. The available SD studies are heterogeneous, mostly monocentric, old, small, and unrepeated, pointing to a high need for more and better studies. We suggest that 2<sup>nd</sup>AH<sub>1</sub> should be the first-line treatment. In uncontrolled cases, the combination of AH<sub>1</sub> and AH<sub>2</sub> may be tried. Even though there is no evidence of its efficacy over standard dosage, updosing of 2<sup>nd</sup>AH<sub>1</sub> may be considered based on the extrapolation of evidence from chronic spontaneous urticaria; omalizumab should be added in recalcitrant patients.
Medical subject headings
- Chronic Urticaria
- Urticaria