A critical review of the Cochrane meta-analysis of routine late-pregnancy ultrasound.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 32598533.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1111/1471-0528.16386.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
A Cochrane review of universal late-pregnancy ultrasound has been highly influential in guiding UK practice, concluding that it does not improve outcome. However, the meta-analysis combines trials that used diverse definitions of screen positive, were designed in the absence of high-quality data on diagnostic effectiveness and did not couple screening to an effective intervention. Moreover, even if the trials had combined a highly effective screening test with a highly effective intervention, the sample size was 15% of that required to study perinatal death. It is not known whether universal late-pregnancy ultrasound confers benefit on the mother or baby. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Despite >50 years of research, we do not know whether universal late-pregnancy ultrasound confers benefit on the mother or baby.
Medical subject headings
- Pregnancy Complications
- Pregnancy Trimester, Second
- Ultrasonography, Prenatal