Editorial Commentary: Revision Hip Surgery After Arthroscopy-What Went Wrong? Are There Second Chances?
editorial · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 32624129.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.04.005.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Hip arthroscopy allows minimally invasive treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) with labral tears. Over the last 2 decades, the indications and techniques for treatment of FAI have evolved, and complex pathology can now be treated arthroscopically. Short- and medium-term patient-reported outcomes demonstrate the reliability of hip arthroscopy for treatment of FAI, although a subset of patients fail to achieve desired results and require revision surgery. The indications for revision surgery after a primary hip arthroscopy are not well described in a large series, and most reviews focus on revision arthroscopy at the exclusion of open surgery (notably periacetabular osteotomy and total hip arthroplasty). Furthermore, patient-reported outcomes after these revision procedures have not been recently summarized.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroscopy
- Femoracetabular Impingement
Anatomy
- hip
- pelvis