A Multi-atlas Approach for Active Bone Marrow Sparing Radiation Therapy: Implementation in the NRG-GY006 Trial.

Yusufaly, Tahir; Miller, Austin; Medina-Palomo, Ana; Williamson, Casey W; Nguyen, Hannah; Lowenstein, Jessica; Leath, Charles A; Xiao, Ying et al. · Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys · 2020

rct · Level II

Where this comes from

Abstract

Sparing active bone marrow (ABM) can reduce acute hematologic toxicity in patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer, but ABM segmentation based on positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is costly. We sought to develop an atlas-based ABM segmentation method for implementation in a prospective clinical trial. A multiatlas was built on a training set of 144 patients and validated in 32 patients from the NRG-GY006 clinical trial. ABM for individual patients was defined as the subvolume of pelvic bone greater than the individual mean standardized uptake value on registered <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT images. Atlas-based and custom ABM segmentations were compared using the Dice similarity coefficient and mean distance to agreement and used to generate ABM-sparing intensity modulated radiation therapy plans. Dose-volume metrics and normal tissue complication probabilities of the two approaches were compared using linear regression. Atlas-based ABM volumes (mean [standard deviation], 548.4 [88.3] cm<sup>3</sup>) were slightly larger than custom ABM volumes (535.1 [93.2] cm<sup>3</sup>), with a Dice similarity coefficient of 0.73. Total pelvic bone marrow V<sub>20</sub> and D<sub>mean</sub> were systematically higher and custom ABM V<sub>10</sub> was systematically lower with custom-based plans (slope: 1.021 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.005-1.037], 1.014 [95% CI, 1.006-1.022], and 0.98 [95% CI, 0.97-0.99], respectively). We found no significant differences between atlas-based and custom-based plans in bowel, rectum, bladder, femoral heads, or target dose-volume metrics. Atlas-based ABM segmentation can reduce pelvic bone marrow dose while achieving comparable target and other normal tissue dosimetry. This approach may allow ABM sparing in settings where PET/CT is unavailable.

Medical subject headings